Array
(
)
Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

709 Results

Clear Search Parameters x
Location: Orange County x
Judge: Howard, Theodore R x 
Array
(
)
SELECT * FROM wp_posts WHERE (post_type = 'attachment') AND ID IN (SELECT object_id FROM wp_term_relationships WHERE term_taxonomy_id IN (SELECT term_id FROM wp_term_taxonomy WHERE taxonomy = 'wpmf-category' AND parent IN (SELECT term_id FROM wp_terms WHERE term_id = 236)) AND term_taxonomy_id IN (SELECT term_id FROM wp_term_taxonomy WHERE taxonomy = 'wpmf-category' AND term_taxonomy_id = 352)) AND (true) AND (true) ORDER BY post_title DESC LIMIT 450,25
Array
(
)
2019.8.22 Motion to Strike Punitive Damages 823
Location: Orange County
Judge: Howard, Theodore R
Hearing Date: 2019.8.22
Excerpt: ...nts relating thereto). Pursuant to CCP §§ 435 and 436, a party may move for an order striking from a pleading “any irrelevant, false or improper matter” or “any part of any pleading not drawn in conformity” with laws, rules or orders. The motion is to be used sparingly, not as a line item veto. PH II, Inc. v. Superior Court (1995) 33 Cal.App.4th 1680, 1683. Defendant contends that the prayer for punitive damages is improper and not draw...
2019.8.22 Motion to Enforce Settlement 766
Location: Orange County
Judge: Howard, Theodore R
Hearing Date: 2019.8.22
Excerpt: ...nt History This action was commenced on 07/19/18. Discovery ensued. On 11/29/18, defendant tendered to plaintiffs checks totaling just over $122,000.00. According to defendant, these checks were intended to cover all of the claims in the case except meal and rest breaks. See Pinedo Decl Para 3-4, 10. The cover letter accompanying the checks confirmed as much: “the totals for each [check] represent the full amount of back wages … [defendant] B...
2019.8.22 Motion for Summary Judgment 874
Location: Orange County
Judge: Howard, Theodore R
Hearing Date: 2019.8.22
Excerpt: ...ter of law. That is because of the general principle that a party who seeks a court's action in his favor bears the burden of persuasion thereon. (See Evid. Code, § 500.) There is a triable issue of material fact if, and only if, the evidence would allow a reasonable trier of fact to find the underlying fact in favor of the party opposing the motion in accordance with the applicable standard of proof.” Aguilar v. Atl. Richfield Co. (2001) 25 C...
2019.8.15 Demurrer 434
Location: Orange County
Judge: Howard, Theodore R
Hearing Date: 2019.8.15
Excerpt: ...aintiff alleges that he was directed by the Defendants into the patient examination room where he lay down on the examination table awaiting a medical professional to see him. (Complaint ¶ 6.) The doctor opened the door to enter and apparently the door hit plaintiff's body, as he lay on the examination table. (Id.) Plaintiff alleges that the poor placement of the examination table in the examination room was a dangerous condition of the room. (C...
2019.8.8 Motion to Quash Service, for Judgment on the Pleadings 819
Location: Orange County
Judge: Howard, Theodore R
Hearing Date: 2019.8.8
Excerpt: ... whether it has specific jurisdiction over Danielson. To establish specific jurisdiction, Aviana was required to show that 1) Danielson purposefully established contacts with California and 2) the claims here arise and are related to California-related claims. Aviana has done so. The evidence establishes that although Danielson lived in Illinois, he worked for Aviana, a California company, as an employee. He reported to Hansen and Ishikawa, both ...
2019.8.8 Demurrer 966
Location: Orange County
Judge: Howard, Theodore R
Hearing Date: 2019.8.8
Excerpt: ... it appears that he received the Demurrer and has waived the improper service. Farrar v. McCormick (1972) 25 Cal. App. 3d 701, 705. As for the Reply, the Court has no way of knowing if it was actually served via e-mail, or to what address it was sent. The Court hereby admonishes Plaintiff to follow the proper statutory procedures for proofs of service in the future. Additionally, the Court also notes that Plaintiff's meet and confer statement is ...
2019.8.8 Demurrer 540
Location: Orange County
Judge: Howard, Theodore R
Hearing Date: 2019.8.8
Excerpt: ...p.4th 280, 291.) Unlike the tort of inducing breach of contract, interference with contractual relations does not require proof of a breach; it only requires proof of interference. (Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Bear Stearns & Co. (1990) 50 Cal.3d 1118, 1129.) Further, it is not necessary that the defendant's conduct be wrongful apart from the interference with the contract itself. (Quelimane Co. v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co. (1998) 19 Cal.4th 26...
2019.8.1 Motion to Compel Further Responses 986
Location: Orange County
Judge: Howard, Theodore R
Hearing Date: 2019.8.1
Excerpt: ...job or contractor names, dates, invoice numbers, and amounts. The Special Interrogatories (“SROGs”) at issue inquired about specific entries or groups of entries in the Summary. The responses at issue as provided by Plaintiff are inadequate. For SROG No. 52, Plaintiff asserted that a response would require a compilation from “voluminous documents in plaintiff's possession,” referred MP to subpoenaed materials without specifying any specif...
2019.8.1 Motion for New Trial 257
Location: Orange County
Judge: Howard, Theodore R
Hearing Date: 2019.8.1
Excerpt: ...des appeared for that hearing, and the application was granted on 6/27/19. But Plaintiff then failed to timely file or serve either his Opening Brief or his Reply. (See 6/27/19 M.O.) Plaintiff thus did not comply with the briefing requirements for this Motion. The Motion fails in any event on the merits. Plaintiff argues that under C.C.P. § 657(1), a new trial should be granted based on evidentiary rulings concerning testimony from Dr. Pressman ...
2019.7.25 Motion to Compel Further Responses 201
Location: Orange County
Judge: Howard, Theodore R
Hearing Date: 2019.7.25
Excerpt: ...each/control. CCP §2030.220. Even if portions of an interrogatory are objectionable, the remaining answerable portion must be substantively addressed. CCP §2030.240; Best Products, Inc. v. Superior Court (2004) 119 Cal.App.4th 1181, 1188-1189. Form Rogs to Diane Stern Plaintiff contends that defendant's refusal to answer FRog 2.5 is a misuse of the discovery process. Therein, plaintiff asks for defendant's present and recent residence address(e...
2019.7.19 Demurrer, Special Motion to Strike 167
Location: Orange County
Judge: Howard, Theodore R
Hearing Date: 2019.7.19
Excerpt: ...Cal.2d 596, 603 [“A cross-complaint is a pleading separate and apart form the answer, and is required to be complete and sufficient in itself. It cannot be aided by averments of the answer.”] Since combining the two is improper, and makes analysis of the cross-claims imprecise, the usual course of action is to strike the pleading sua sponte and give defendant leave to file separately an answer and cross- complaint. Doing so will moot the pres...
2019.7.19 Motion for Attorney Fees 380
Location: Orange County
Judge: Howard, Theodore R
Hearing Date: 2019.7.19
Excerpt: .... As the prevailing party, Defendants are entitled to an award representing their fees and costs incurred in litigating the Anti-SLAPP motion pursuant to Code Civ. Proc. § 425.15(c).) Under this provision, any SLAPP defendant who brings a successful motion to strike is entitled to mandatory attorney fees. (Ketchum v. Moses (2001) 24 Cal. 4 th 1122, 1131.) This does not mean that the prevailing party is entitled to receive whatever it asks for, h...
2019.7.19 Motion to Compel Further Responses 880
Location: Orange County
Judge: Howard, Theodore R
Hearing Date: 2019.7.19
Excerpt: ...e the 5/2/19 Order. Thus, the court admonishes Plaintiff, again. A. Special Interrogatories, Set One The court grants in part Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Further Responses to Special Interrogatories, Set One, as to Defendant KPC Healthcare Holdings, Inc. Defendant is ordered to provide a verified response, without objections to Nos. 13, 14, 15, and 18 only. The court denies each party's request for sanctions. The court denies the Motion as to No...
2019.7.18 Motion to Compel Arbitration 876
Location: Orange County
Judge: Howard, Theodore R
Hearing Date: 2019.7.18
Excerpt: ... Agreement calls for arbitration to be submitted to Henning Mediation & Arbitration Service (“Henning”). Edgerton Decl., Ex. C - Partnership Agreement, Article XXVI § C, pg. 31-32. Apparently, Henning's only location is in Atlanta, Georgia. Hall Decl. ¶ 5. The Court also notes that even if the Partnership Agreement were not the document referenced in the Purchase Agreement, Plaintiff has provided no alternative document that the Purchase Ag...
2019.7.18 Motion to Compel Answers to Deposition Questions 599
Location: Orange County
Judge: Howard, Theodore R
Hearing Date: 2019.7.18
Excerpt: ...ustification as well. (CCP § 2025.480(j).) MP shall give notice unless notice is waived. Deposition Question, regarding where the Defendant currently lives. There are highly divergent views of the alleged “incident” here, and as to who was the perpetrator or aggressor. The record reflects a basis for the Defendant to have concern. (See Opposing Exhibit 2 p. 136-137 and 142-143 and 106 – 110, 40-42, see Opposing Exhibit 4.). Further, a pers...
2019.7.18 Demurrer 852
Location: Orange County
Judge: Howard, Theodore R
Hearing Date: 2019.7.18
Excerpt: ...rt is not limited to direct body-to-body contact. (See Mount Vernon Fire Insurance Corporation v. Oxnard Hospitality Enterprise, Inc. (2013) 219 Cal.App.4th 876, 881.) But the intent element requires that the defendant either intended to commit a battery or was substantially certain that battery would result from his/her conduct. (CACI 1320; Ashcraft v. King (1991) 228 Cal.App.3d 604, 613.) In the FAC, Plaintiffs assert that by sending them to an...
2019.6.27 Motion to Compel Further Responses 506
Location: Orange County
Judge: Howard, Theodore R
Hearing Date: 2019.6.27
Excerpt: ...he employee's personnel file is off-limits. In California, discovery is purposefully broad. With certain exceptions, parties have a right to inquire about any matter which – based on reason, logic and common sense – might (1) be admissible, (2) lead to admissible evidence, or (3) reasonably assist that party in evaluating the case, preparing for trial and/or facilitating resolution. Children's Hospital Central California v. Blue Cross of Cali...
2019.6.6 Motion to Tax Costs 681
Location: Orange County
Judge: Howard, Theodore R
Hearing Date: 2019.6.6
Excerpt: ... entitled to recover costs as a matter of right. The allowed costs are enumerated in CCP § 1033.5(a) and discretionary items are also permitted under § 1033.5(c). Defendant's verified memorandum of costs is prima facie evidence that the costs were proper and necessarily incurred. (Adams v. Ford Motor Co. (2011) 199 Cal.App.4th 1475, 1486; Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007) 149 Cal.App.4th 836, 856.) There is no requirement for the Defendant...
2019.6.6 Motion to Set Aside Default, Judgment 324
Location: Orange County
Judge: Howard, Theodore R
Hearing Date: 2019.6.6
Excerpt: ...Plaintiff did not oppose the motion substantively. Instead, plaintiff contends that the motion was not properly served or timely noticed – requiring a continuance of the hearing. The pending motion was filed on 05/03/19, but not served upon plaintiff until 05/15/19. The papers were served via regular US Mail. Minimum statutory notice for a motion is 16 court days. CCP §1005(b). When service is made by regular US mail, 5 additional calendar day...
2019.6.6 Motion to Reopen Discovery 671
Location: Orange County
Judge: Howard, Theodore R
Hearing Date: 2019.6.6
Excerpt: ...2024.050(a), on motion of any party, the Court “may grant leave to complete discovery proceedings, or to have a motion concerning discovery heard, closer to the initial trial date, or to reopen discovery after a new trial date has been set.” Further, in exercising its discretion to grant or deny such a request, the Court should consider: (1) The necessity and the reasons for the discovery; (2) The diligence of the party seeking the discovery�...
2019.6.6 Motion for Termiinating Sanctions 694
Location: Orange County
Judge: Howard, Theodore R
Hearing Date: 2019.6.6
Excerpt: ...sanctions tailored to the harm caused by the misuse of the discovery process and should not exceed what is required to protect the party harmed by the misuse of the discovery process. (Lopez, supra, at p. 604.) Therefore, sanctions are generally imposed in an incremental approach, with terminating sanctions being the last resort. (Ibid.) However, even under the Civil Discovery Act's incremental approach, the trial court may impose terminating san...
2019.6.6 Motion for Protective Order 592
Location: Orange County
Judge: Howard, Theodore R
Hearing Date: 2019.6.6
Excerpt: ...ed her Complaint for damages on July 12, 2018 alleging sexual harassment, retaliation, failure to take all reasonable steps to prevent discrimination and harassment, negligent supervision, intentional infliction of emotional distress, quid pro quo sexual harassment, and breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing. The plaintiff alleges that the defendant told her that his wife was no longer having sexual relations with him. Authorities:...
2019.6.6 Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint470
Location: Orange County
Judge: Howard, Theodore R
Hearing Date: 2019.6.6
Excerpt: ...:  Specify in the moving papers by page, paragraph, and line number the allegations proposed to be added and/or deleted; and  Include with the moving papers:  a copy of the proposed amended pleading; and  a declaration specifying: 1. the effect of the amendment(s); 2. why the amendment is necessary and proper; 3. when the facts giving rise to the amended allegations were discovered; and 4. the reasons why the request was not made earl...
2019.6.6 Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding Verdict 772
Location: Orange County
Judge: Howard, Theodore R
Hearing Date: 2019.6.6
Excerpt: ...ehensive discussion is still warranted. The jury found in Cannivet's favor on his cross-complaint for breach of contract and quantum meruit, based on his proof of a joint venture with Palo. These findings are challenged herein. It should be noted since the time of the jury verdict on Cannivet's cross-complaint, this Court ruled against Cannivet on his various remaining equitable claims, as follows:  On Cannivet's cause of action for promissory...
2019.6.6 Motion for Attorneys' Fees 540
Location: Orange County
Judge: Howard, Theodore R
Hearing Date: 2019.6.6
Excerpt: ...dentified attorneys in moving exhibit A, whose rate the Court is reducing to $300 per hour (- 3,600). Added to this, is 14 hours for reasonable work for this fee proceeding (14 x 425 = + 5,950) and finally, 25 hrs. are added for reasonable paralegal time at the reasonable rate of $125/hrs. to cover the range of work that is described in moving exhibit A (25 x 125 = +3,125). Preliminary Matters The papers indicate that case has settled. Plaintiff ...

709 Results

Per page

Pages