Excerpt: ...and confer in person or by telephone due to delays caused by injuries to Plaintiff's counsel. The Court, in its discretion, has opted to reach the merits of the Demurrer. Basis for Defense on Face of Pleading Defendant argues that Plaintiff's statements in Plaintiff's March 2, 2021 letter, attached as Exh. B to the First Amended Complaint, that his Senior Inspector position was temporary, create a bar to recovery because they contradict the alleg...

Excerpt: ...aint, filed by Cross-defendants U.S. Bank and Viva Capital 3, is sustained with leave to amend. For purposes the statute of limitations, California law applies. The applicable statute of limitations is one year. A. Statute of Limitations 1. The Court Should Apply the California Statute of Limitations. In general, whether a claim is barred by a statute of limitations “is a procedural matter governed by the law of the forum, regardless of where t...

Excerpt: ...o strike, the allegations in the complaint are considered in context and presumed to be true: ‘(J)udges read allegations of a pleading subject to a motion to strike as a whole, all parts in their context, and assume their truth.' ” (Weil & Brown, supra, at § 7:197.5, quoting Clauson v. Superior Court (Pedus Services, Inc.) (1998) 67 Cal.App.4th 1253, 1255.) Accordingly, a motion to strike “will be granted only if it is clear that the matte...

Excerpt: ...laint and the reasonable inferences that may be drawn from those facts.” (Miklosy v. Regents of the University of Cal. (2008) 44 Cal.4th 876, 883.) The Court may “also consider matters that may be judicially noticed . . . .” (Brown v. Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. (2016) 247 Cal.App.4th 275, 279.) The Court does “not, however, assume the truth of contentions, deductions or conclusions of law.” (Guerrero v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. (20...

Excerpt: ... Procedure § 387(d)(2) provides: “The court may, upon timely application, permit a nonparty to intervene in the action or proceeding if the person has an interest in the matter in litigation, or in the success of either of the parties, or an interest against both.” Plaintiff acknowledges that Claimant is seeking to intervene. See Memorandum filed January 24, 2023 at 6. Likewise, Defendant understands that “if I make this claim of possessio...

Excerpt: ... raised in trial courts throughout California as a result of the United States Supreme Court' s decision in by Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. Moriana (2022) 142 S.Ct. 1906 (“Viking River Cruises”).) There are cases winding their way through the California appellate courts on this issue. Based upon the ruling in Viking River Cruises and applicable California law, the Court GRANTS Defendant's motion to compel arbitration of Plaintiff Luz Saavedr...

Excerpt: ...88, 499 is to continue the motion to allow discovery as to Broadway's financial condition and its insurance coverage. See City of Grand Terrace v. Sup.Ct. (1987) 192 Cal.App.3d 1251, 1265. The parties shall meet-and-confer prior to the hearing to discuss the timing and scope of that discovery. The evidence demonstrates that liability is disputed and there is evidence where a fact finder could find Broadway the primary tortfeasor as well as eviden...

Excerpt: ...iv. Proc. Sect. 430.10(e)), that the Complaint is “uncertain” (Sect. 430.10(f)), and that this case should be “abated” pending resolution of an earlier-filed civil case involving these same parties (Sect. 430.10(c)). The Court disagrees. The Complaint sufficiently states a cause of action for unlawful detainer (UD). Civ. Code Sect. 1161(1). It alleges that Defendants Broers and Olabi entered into lease agreements for the Premises, that th...

Excerpt: ... its discretion to still consider it since there does not appear to be any prejudice to the County since it filed a substantive reply. It appears that the opposition was late because Plaintiff did not realize that Monday, February 13, 2023 is a court holiday, a mistake that many people make. The Demurrer is OVERRULED based on failure to allege facts sufficient to support the claim for dangerous condition of public property. “A public entity had...

Excerpt: ...on, and $4,108.43 in costs for a total of $53,675.43 pursuant to Cal. Civil Code § 1794(d) and the parties' settlement agreement. Plaintiff's Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED pursuant to Cal. Evidence Code §452(d). Defendant's Opposition was due to be filed by January 30, 2023, nine court days prior to the hearing on this Motion. The Opposition was untimely filed on January 31, 2023. The Court, in its discretion, has considered the late-f...

Excerpt: ...t (“FAC”) is SUSTAINED WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. Plaintiffs shall file a Second Amended Complaint no later than ten (10) days after service of written notice of entry of this order and the order on the concurrent motion to strike. Legal Standard on Demurrer A defendant may demur to a cause of action in a complaint on the grounds that, inter alia, the pleading does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, the pleading is uncertai...

Excerpt: ...native Motion for Summary Adjudication is also DENIED as to each of the five issues set forth in Woodland's 11-10-22 Notice of Motion. In denying this Motion, the Court offers no opinion as to the ultimate merit of the two claims (negligence and breach of warranty) asserted against Woodland. The Court merely finds, based on the evidence presented here, that these two claims cannot be resolved via summary judgment/adjudication. Legal standard on s...

Excerpt: ...n Rogue (“vehicle”) that came with express warranties by Defendant. (See Defendant's Request for Judicial Notice, Exh. 1.) Plaintiff filed this action on September 7, 2021 claiming that the vehicle was delivered with serious defects and nonconformities to warranty, and that Defendant was unable to repair it and also failed to promptly replace the vehicle or make restitution. (Ibid.) The Complaint alleges three causes of action for violations ...

Excerpt: ...OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION Defendant City of Millbrae's (City) Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication (Motion) came for hearing before this Court on February 9, 2023 at 2:00 p.m. All parties appeared through their counsel. Having considered all papers filed in support of and in opposition to the Motion, oral arguments of the parties, any testimony and evidence presented at the hearing, and all o...

Excerpt: ...positions of Golden Gate Produce Terminal Ltd.'s Board of Directors Peter Carcione, Stephen Hurwitz, and Joseph Carcione, Jr (Motion) is DENIED. Plaintiff's request for sanctions is DENIED. Plaintiff contends “apex” depositions of three members of Plaintiff's Board of Directors are improper because Defendant has not made the showing required by Liberty Mutual Ins. Co. v. Superior Court (Frysinger) (1992) 10 Cal.App.4th 1282, 1287-1288 (Libert...

Excerpt: ...61 Cal.4th 435, 441; Health and Safety Code § 50003(a). The First Amended Petition alleges facts demonstrating the City's efforts to mitigate the housing crisis in its city. As has become increasingly frequent, solutions to solving the housing crisis comes into potential conflict with policies protecting the environment. In 1970, the California Legislature enacted the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Public Resources Code § 21000 et...

Excerpt: ...efects from their prior motion, which the Court had denied on June 15, 2022. The present motion explains the new facts that rise the request to add Rona Maskan as a defendant and that the facts were discovered in April 2021. The present motion also includes the proposed pleading and an explanation of the new allegations. Plaintiffs promptly filed a 4th Amended Complaint on April 26, 2021. A. Plaintiffs Did not Act with Reasonable Diligence As to ...

Excerpt: ...eave to amend as to D & B. (Id. at 2:23-6:8.) As to Netwise, plaintiff pleads that its founder and CEO Dwight Gorall sexually assaulted and harassed her at a business event put on by plaintiff and her employer LiveRamp, Inc. (Cmplt. 3:6-4:9.) Civil Code 51.9 (sexual harassment): Plaintiff pleads that she helped host the LiveRamp "executive dinner for its clients and business partners" such as Gorall's Netwise at which Gorall groped and otherwise ...

Excerpt: ... pages 3 and 4, paragraphs 19, 21, 26‐29, 31, 34, 35, and items 4 and 7 of the Prayer for Relief in the SAC. Defendants maintain that these portions of the pleading are irrelevant and false. To the extent the Motion relies on the request for judicial notice, it is not well taken. If the documents were accepted as judicially noticeable, to the extent Defendants contest the factual allegations of the pleading it is an evidentiary matter that does...

Excerpt: ...ries, request for admissions, request for production of documents, and form interrogatory 17.1. DFS GREEN argues that the discovery requests exceed the scope of permissible discovery because they exceed the limitations of GALICHA's PAGA Notice and partially pertain to claims outside of the one‐year limitations period that applies to GALICHA's personal claims. The arguments are unpersuasive. 1. The Statute of Limitations Does not Preclude Discov...

Excerpt: ...e Defendant ARE's 11‐3‐22 Request for Judicial Notice (Lease) is GRANTED, to the extent stated below. Evid. Code Sect. 452(d), (h). Incelldx's Opposition brief argues that as Plaintiff, Incelldx was not obligated to attached the Lease to the Complaint in order to state a cause of action for breach of contract. True or not, that is a separate issue from whether Defendant may properly seek judicial notice of the Lease to support its Demurrer. H...

Excerpt: ...rted by an otherwise sufficient claim or defense.” (Weil & Brown, Cal. Prac. Guide: Civ. Proc. Before Trial (The Rutter Group June 2020) § 7:178 (Weil & Brown).) Defendant moves to strike: (1) introductory allegations about the results of surveys on the prevalence of security deposit withholding in California (see Compl., ¶¶ 1‐6) and (2) the punitive damage allegations (see id., ¶¶ 6, 80, 100, 109, 113 & p. 22). As explained below, the M...

Excerpt: ...dale Shopping Center (Hillsdale) (collectively, Defendants) is GRANTED. A. Facts Plaintiff Abigail Masic‐Maharaj, a toddler, approached the escalator unaccompanied by an adult. (Statement of Undisputed Facts (SUF), ¶ 1.) Plaintiff fell on the escalator while unaccompanied by an adult. (Id., ¶ 2.) “Immediately after the incident, the escalator was shut down and inspected.” (Id., ¶ 3.) The inspection revealed “[n]o defects or operational...

Excerpt: ...d confer requirement imposed by Code of Civil Procedure section 430.41, subdivision (a). Plaintiff's meet and confer declaration simply states that “On October 25, 2022, I attempted to meet and confer with Craig Smith, counsel for Cross‐Complainant, regarding a demurrer to the First Amended Cross‐Complaint in this matter. I sent via email the letter attached hereto as ‘Exhibit A' and invited Mr. Smith to have a telephone conference regard...

Excerpt: ...i (collectively, Plaintiffs) concede that the causes of action in their Amended Complaint “are less than well pled.” (Opp., at p. 1.) Instead of opposing the Demurrer on the merits, they attach a Proposed Second Amended Complaint (Proposed SAC) as evidence that leave to amend should be granted. (See Opp., ex. A.) Although the Proposed SAC does not cure all the defects identified by Defendants, the Court cannot conclude that there is no reason...